Subscribe to Miguel Delaney’s Reading the Game newsletter for no cost and have it delivered directly to your email.
Subscribe to Miguel Delaney’s weekly newsletter for free.
Was the match between Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur a comedic representation of modern football or one of the most exciting games of the season? It could be argued that it was both, given the confusing and contradictory nature of the game. Chelsea’s 4-1 win over Tottenham Hotspur will have significant implications for both teams’ seasons. For Mauricio Pochettino’s side, it was a much-needed victory, especially at a stadium that holds a special place in his heart. Ange Postecoglou’s bold strategy of playing with a high defensive line despite having nine players and no main center-backs was risky, but it ultimately paid off. The home crowd applauded the team’s valiant effort, but there was a sense of disappointment as their momentum was disrupted by Nicolas Jackson’s second goal. Not only did Spurs lose their first league game under Postecoglou, but they also face the absence of Destiny Udogie and Sergio Romero due to suspensions, and possibly James Maddison and Micky van de Ven due to injuries.
This situation has the sensation of causing a downfall for a flight that had been surprisingly successful for a period of time.
Postecoglou may have chosen to explain to his team that it was an unusual game. This could be one way of describing it. It was a combination of various events, resembling both the notorious Battle of the Bridge and the recent Copa Libertadores final. It also served as a platform for the ongoing discussions about VAR, and ultimately turned into a peculiar but bold practice session. Postecoglou appeared to have pitted the unstoppable Guglielmo Vicario against the entire youthful attack of Chelsea.
Furthermore, in a sudden change of events, the previously struggling Jackson was able to score three goals in quick succession towards the end of the game.
While it wasn’t a complete display of finishing, there was still enough to demonstrate the potential that exists.
The evening featured a combination of different football events, but there were also moments that seemed to belong to separate games.
It was incredible to contemplate this by even the half-hour mark, but the first 18 minutes looked like it would be a comprehensive and confident Spurs win to continue their early-season surge.
They were shredding Chelsea, especially on the wings. Both sides were being targeted, something inevitable given all the space, and the first real attack brought a goal. Dejan Kulusevski shot and the ball cannoned off Levi Colwell and past Robert Sanchez.
Reece James was even more vulnerable on the opposite side, as Brennan Johnson effortlessly made his way through and passed to Son Heung-Min for an easy goal. The ease of it all caused Spurs to become overconfident, resulting in Son’s goal being disallowed for being offside.
The following events were even more perplexing due to Destiny Udogie’s imprudent tackle on Raheem Sterling. Although he did not receive a red card at the time, the atmosphere of the game shifted drastically. This was also reminiscent of Chekov’s concept, as Udogie made similar challenges later on. The match took on a similar intensity to past fixtures like the Battle of the Bridge and the Libertadores final. Cristian Romero was at the forefront, with two challenges that could have resulted in red cards.
He was ultimately removed from the game as part of the same series of events that resulted in a second goal for Chelsea being disallowed, leading to a penalty being awarded.
It was challenging to stay on track, as the feeling of being out of place was heightened by the fast-paced nature of the match, which was frequently interrupted by lengthy VAR reviews. While Cole Palmer’s resulting penalty may not have been executed perfectly, it still managed to find its way into the goal.
Pochettino made other significant changes aside from Udogie’s challenge. He also adjusted Chelsea’s formation to give them the advantage in terms of tactics, even before Romero’s red card.
It likely should not have reached that point for Spurs. The situation was only going to deteriorate. Both Maddison and Van de Ven were forced to leave the game due to injuries before Udogie was ultimately given a red card.
The following turn of events was possibly the most surprising turn of events. Postecoglou did not back down, instead he intensified his stance.
Even though Tottenham was down to nine players due to injuries and their two main defenders were substituted, Postecoglou’s tactics seemed to involve pushing even further forward. As a result, Tottenham essentially relinquished control of their own half to Chelsea’s offensive efforts.
It was daring, to say the least. This resulted in Chelsea creating multiple one-on-one opportunities, turning the game into a practice session for their forwards and Guglielmo Vicario. There was some vague implementation of the offside trap in between.
However, it is possible that there was a logical explanation for this. Due to the youth and lack of experience in the Chelsea team, many players continued to make poor decisions even when presented with good opportunities. There was a lack of coordinated runs and positioning, as Mykhailo Mudryk and Nicolas Jackson frequently went in the wrong direction.
Vicario, on the other hand, displayed exceptional skill. Each improbable save added to the intensity of the game. It seemed that with each failed attempt to score – which were becoming more and more frequent – their confidence was slowly diminishing.
Chelsea could have been extremely embarrassed by this game, but instead it ended up being a humiliating defeat for Tottenham.
However, the potential danger was deemed too high. A team with a skilled player like Sterling was bound to succeed eventually. It was indeed his assist that led to Jackson’s goal.
With a score of 2-1, the Spurs were forced to push even harder. Jackson made an even bigger impact, scoring twice during stoppage time. This could potentially be a pivotal moment for both him and the Spurs, but it came after a tumultuous night.
One could attempt to understand it, but it may be better to simply have firsthand experience.
Unable to rephrase.