The footage captured from above displays the moment when an RAF Typhoon attacked a military target in Yemen.
To receive immediate updates on breaking news, simply subscribe to our breaking news emails and have them delivered directly to your inbox, free of charge.
Register for our complimentary email alerts for breaking news.
The US Central Command reports that a US fighter plane successfully intercepted and eliminated an anti-ship cruise missile fired by Houthi rebels in Yemen towards the USS Laboon destroyer in the Red Sea.
Last week, airstrikes carried out by the US and UK targeted the international airport in Hodeidah, a port city located on the western coast of Yemen. The incident took place there.
Prior to this, American authorities cautioned that the Houthis still possessed the capability to launch missiles even after conducting significant airstrikes on approximately 30 sites on Thursday and Friday.
The United Kingdom joined the United States-led operation in attacking over 60 missile and drone targets as a response to the group’s attacks on ships in the Red Sea.
However, even though approximately 90% of the objectives were successfully achieved, two American officials cautioned on Sunday that the organization still possesses about 75% of its capacity to launch missiles and drones at ships in the narrow waterway.
The New York Times stated, under the condition of anonymity, that two officials claimed that only 20 to 30 percent of the Houthis’ offensive capability has been eliminated.
According to them, the challenge was that a lot of the Houthis’ attack tools were portable and could be relocated or concealed.
Lord Cameron has cautioned that if the Houthi faction persists in targeting ships in the Red Sea, Britain may take further action against them.
Satellite imagery shows the destruction of Houthi targets before and after the airstrikes conducted by the US-led coalition.
Recently released satellite photographs reveal the changes that have occurred at the Houthi locations targeted by airstrikes led by the United States. These strikes have been prompted by the group’s ongoing interference with cargo operations in the Red Sea.
The Houthis allege that they are attacking ships in the Red Sea that either belong to or are en route to Israel, as a show of support for Hamas in Gaza.
The group has made a pledge to retaliate against both the UK and US for the strikes that took place this week, claiming that they resulted in five deaths and at least six injuries.
Joe Biden has stated that the United States will not hesitate to take additional actions to safeguard our citizens and ensure the smooth movement of global trade, if needed.
Satellite images show the destruction caused by US-led airstrikes on Houthi sites before and after the attacks.
Recent satellite photos reveal the changes at Houthi locations struck by US-led airstrikes. These strikes come as the Houthis persist in interfering with cargo in the Red Sea. The group declares their aim to target vessels in the Red Sea that belong to or are en route to Israel, in solidarity with Hamas in Gaza. They have threatened retaliation against both the UK and US for the strikes this week, claiming five deaths and six injuries. Joe Biden has stated that the US will not hesitate to take additional actions to safeguard their citizens and maintain the smooth flow of international trade, if needed.
Today, Rishi Sunak will make a statement regarding the Houthi strikes.
Today, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will speak to Members of Parliament in the House of Commons regarding the recent military attacks on Houthi targets in Yemen that took place on Thursday.
Sunak faced criticism from certain Members of Parliament (MPs) for participating in military intervention in the Red Sea alongside the United States without seeking approval from parliament.
He is anticipated to give a spoken address to Members of Parliament this afternoon in which he will clarify the choice and respond to inquiries from his peers.
Later today, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak of Britain will speak to Parliament about the recent Houthi attacks that occurred last week.
Grant Shapps stated that the intention was to clearly communicate a message to the Houthis.
According to Grant Shapps, the British attacks on Houthis in Yemen were a deliberate means of conveying a distinct message to the rebels who are supported by Iran.
The defense secretary refuted any claims that the UK had plans to invade Yemen or engage in similar actions.
He stated that the purpose was to clearly communicate to the Houthis, who are supported by Iran, that their actions in the Red Sea were not tolerated.
The statement from Mr Shapps stated that if the Houthis continue to attack cargo ships in the Red Sea, Britain will take action once more. He also mentioned that government officials will make necessary decisions.
The United Kingdom’s Secretary of Defence, Grant Shapps, stated that the country has no plans to enter Yemen.
Summary: What is the reasoning behind the British and American attacks on the Iran-supported Houthi rebels in Yemen?
The Houthis carried out a major attack on Red Sea shipping, which was one of 27 similar incidents that have occurred since 19 November.
Authorities reported that a total of 21 missiles and drones were launched at both military and civilian ships in the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a crucial passage in the southern Red Sea. American and British naval vessels successfully intercepted and destroyed the projectiles.
This is our current understanding:
Houthis: Rebels supported by Iran launching assaults on vessels in the Red Sea.
The militant organization asserts that it initiated attacks on a small stretch of water between Yemen and east Africa, which serves as an important global trade pathway, in an attempt to halt Israel’s aerial and land assault on Hamas.
Who exactly are the Houthi rebels in Yemen? What is their connection to the Israel-Palestine conflict and what is the reason for their current attacks on western vessels?
Please refer to the complete article here:
In case you missed it, Starmer is advocating for a lasting ceasefire in Gaza that is environmentally friendly.
Laura Kuenssberg asked Keir Starmer if it is appropriate as the leader of the Labour party to request a halt in hostilities.
Keir expressed the need for a lasting ceasefire and posed the question of how to achieve it.
He stated the necessity for a “humanitarian ceasefire” to facilitate the delivery of aid and the release of all captives held by Hamas.
When questioned again, he clarified that he is not demanding an instant halt to hostilities.
Once more, Sir Keir Starmer, the leader of the Labour party, has lessened his commitments.
In case you missed it: Trump criticizes Biden, calling him the “worst president” for his response to Houthi airstrikes.
“Keep in mind that this is the identical group that ‘surrendered’ in Afghanistan without any consequences or dismissals,” stated Mr Trump. “It was an incredibly humiliating ‘incident’ in the history of our country. And now we have conflicts in Ukraine, Israel, and Yemen, but no ‘battle’ on our Southern Border. How illogical. Corrupt Joe Biden is undoubtedly the poorest President we’ve ever had!”
Did you miss it? Are we getting involved in something that we won’t be able to disentangle from?
The editor in chief of The Independent expressed concern about the potential consequences of Lord’s Cameron interview, questioning if it could lead to a situation with no easy solution.
Both Cameron and Starmer’s arguments are valid, however, there are warning signals, potentially indicating a cautionary or critical situation.
What is the outcome if the Houthi rebels retaliate?
In terms of US military attacks, the UK has typically played a supportive role, but following joint action against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, London should inquire of Washington: what is the strategy… and how do we withdraw from this situation?
Sean O’Grady writes:
What will occur if the Houthi insurgents retaliate?
When it comes to US military strikes, the UK is used to being a loyal, junior helper – but after last night’s co-ordinated action against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, London should be asking Washington: what’s the plan… and how do we get out of this one?
In case you missed it, the foreign secretary has defended their decision to not consult parliament regarding the Houthi attacks.
Lord Cameron explained that parliament was not consulted about the Houthi attacks because swift action was required to launch the strikes in Yemen in order to maintain operational security.
He expressed that he believed it would not have been appropriate to hold a parliamentary debate before the strikes. Nonetheless, there will be a statement given in the House of Commons tomorrow.
Source: independent.co.uk
