Subscribe to the View from Westminster email to receive insightful analysis directly to your email inbox.
Receive our complimentary email newsletter from Westminster’s perspective.
Rishi Sunak cautioned that migrants could potentially “flood” countries, including the UK, if significant measures are not implemented. He also pledged to advocate for changes to the international regulations concerning refugees.
During a conference organized by far-right Italian leader Giorgia Meloni, the prime minister emphasized the importance of addressing illegal migration, stating that neglecting to do so would erode the public’s trust in politicians and our governmental systems.
During his address in Rome, he cautioned against “enemy” nations purposely sending people to our shores in an attempt to disrupt our societies.
He referenced Margaret Thatcher’s “radicalism” while attempting to defend his contentious proposal to expel refugees to Rwanda. The plan has faced criticism from members of his own party.
His remarks seemed to reflect the harsher stance on immigration of his dismissed home secretary, Suella Braverman. Braverman faced backlash last year for asserting that the UK was experiencing an “invasion” on its southern coast.
Critics alleged that he was following her strategies and claimed that the Conservative party was competing to make the most harmful impact on the discussion.
The day after a migrant lost their life attempting to cross the English Channel, Mr Sunak issued a warning that if the issue is not addressed immediately, there will continue to be a steady flow of boats and more lives will be lost at sea.
He stated that if it is necessary, we must revise our laws and initiate a global discussion to revise the post-war guidelines regarding asylum.
Sources from the government stated that this may encompass a variety of pacts made after the war, such as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Refugee Convention. These sentiments were positively received by Conservative Members of Parliament on the conservative wing of the party.
During his visit to Italy, Mr Sunak met with both Ms Meloni and Albania’s Prime Minister Edi Rama. Together, they reached an agreement to provide funding for a plan aimed at repatriating migrants from Tunisia, which is located just across the sea from Italy, to their respective home countries. In his speech, Mr Sunak emphasized the importance of addressing migration and stated that it called for a level of radicalism and determination similar to that of Thatcher.
He commended the Italian prime minister and stated that they were both committed to disrupting the operations of criminal organizations that smuggle individuals in small boats.
The address was given at the Atreju festival, organized by Ms. Meloni’s populist Brothers of Italy party and oddly named after a character from the 1984 children’s fantasy movie, The NeverEnding Story.
Applauded by the audience, Mr. Sunak stated that in order to address illegal migration, we may need to revise our laws and take the lead in an international discussion to modify post-World War II asylum policies.
If we do not address this issue immediately, there will continue to be a flow of boats and more people will perish at sea.
He stated: “Our adversaries are simply choosing to overlook this matter. They are choosing to ignore it and hope it disappears. But I must inform them, it will not.”
Sunak warned that inaction would demonstrate our vulnerability and make us susceptible to adversaries using migration as a means to purposely disrupt our communities by intentionally sending people to our borders.
Finland has accused Russia of deliberately sending migrants to the European Union in order to create unrest within the bloc.
According to Mr Sunak, if we do not address this issue, it will continue to worsen and become too much for our countries to handle, limiting our ability to assist those who require our assistance the most.
Our citizens will be upset about the expenses of housing these individuals. They may not comprehend why their money must be used to address the aftermath of this immoral business. This will not only undermine their trust in us as leaders, but also in our government as a whole.
Liberal Democrat spokesperson for home affairs, Alistair Carmichael, accused Rishi Sunak of following the tactics of Priti Braverman. Carmichael stated, “Sunak is resorting to the divisive rhetoric found in Braverman’s playbook in a desperate attempt to deflect from his failures in handling asylum issues.” The Conservative Party’s internal conflicts are now resulting in a competition to see who can make the most inflammatory remarks during the debate.
“It is also a bit rich to say we need international cooperation when Conservative ministers are trashing the very treaties that we have signed up to to deal with this. Who would want to cooperate with a government that is happy to disregard our legal obligations? Instead of posturing, Rishi Sunak would do better to focus on tackling the asylum backlog that is leaving people in limbo and costing taxpayers billions.”
However, the remarks made by Mr. Sunak were well-received by conservative MPs. Danny Kruger, the head of the New Conservatives group, expressed his enthusiasm for the Prime Minister’s speech, which proposed revising refugee and human rights regulations through an international agreement.
In a speech that received widespread criticism, Ms. Braverman, who was then the home secretary, warned that without significant changes to global refugee regulations, up to 780 million individuals could potentially seek asylum.
She received strong criticism for targeting the LGBTQ+ community and stating that being gay, female, or afraid of discrimination was now sufficient to meet the qualifications.
Source: independent.co.uk